The End of ST Petersburg-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Quetion: Write a Short History of Movies The end of St. Petersburg. Answer: The film industry of Russia was under the Europe colony prior to 1917 but re-emerged with the Russian Revolution. There is no history of film being shot in the country by any Russian company until 1908. The films that were shot in Russia before 1917 contained the American and European components of melodramas, costume films and horror (Mast Bruce, 2006). With the reading of this book, I found out that most of the Russian films followed the trend of narration which was actually set by other film industries. In the course of the study, I have also analyzed that the particular trend has changed with the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution had taken place in three stages of which the first one occurred in 1905. This revolution was on the uprising of workers which continued for months. The second revolution took place in February 1917 to remove the czar from power. The third revolution occurred in October 1917. After finding out about these major revolutions I realized that these were the reasons behind the Soviet film industry to become stagnant till a certain time. The leader of the final revolution, Lenin considered cinema to be the most influential art form which is not only a form of entertainment but also helped in modifying the values (Graffy, 2011). The prominent wars had a negative impact on the film industry by resulting in the scarcity of raw and unreleased films in Europe as well as in Russia, the latter being in a worse condition. The minimum raw stock that was available in the industry was the end parts remaining in the czarist studios which were not at all fit to be made into finished films. From this portion, I understood that shots need to be precise with proper planning. I think that with the scarcity of stocks it was more important for the industry to make newsreels instead of feature films (MacFadyen, 2004). The End of St. Petersburg (1927) not only portrayed political education but also a pivotal character deceived the revolutionist in the beginning of the film. Thus it was evaluated from this film that a peasant should always leave his own country for survival as his own place does not have sufficient land or food. The film showcased the opening scenes with a compare and contrast between the city and the countryside. I felt that a negative image of the country was reflected which would make the people aware about the condition that they are living in. It was shown in the film that the youth had gone violent and went against the leaders of the revolution. Apart from this there was a structural leap in the second part of the film with the ignorance of narrative focus (Cook, 2016). The intention behind this film was to celebrate the 10th year of the final Bolshevic revolution but it went beyond to stand in a prestigious position with a bag full of tales about the farm as well as factory. From this essay I understood that the political scenario at that point of time had played a significant role in the development of the film industry. References Cook, D. A. (2016).A history of narrative film. WW Norton Company. Graffy, J. (2011). Literature and film.The Cambridge Companion to Twentieth-Century Russian Literature, 235. MacFadyen, D. (2004). The End of St. Petersburg.The Modern Language Review,99(4), 1126-1128. Mast, G., Bruce, F. K. (2006). A Short History of the Movies.